thank you mr readme

? Offline

@navi i mean it was like a single file with like 200 lines with no external imports so at least their claim isn't entirely baseless, it's just funny to claim this and not elaborate any further

? Offline

@kopper ah, I think I've stumbled across this before
https://social.troll.academy/@mushu/114320895082950526

Love how we both had the impulse of 'this needs to be highlighted'

? Offline

@kopper The package is perfectly safe. It's you that's in trouble.

(Joke courtesy Douglas Adams).

catsalad@infosec.exchange

@kopper @laura_fae I was worried with all that botnet activity running in the background, but alas, I had yet to see the readme

? Offline

@kopper evil bit set to zero

? Offline

@kopper clean for opsec.

? Offline

@kopper compliance

? Offline

@kopper Reminds me of some recent GitHub project I ran into where it effectively stated the same thing where it was like "a bunch of antivirus programs claim this is malicious. It's not" and it's like "ok boss!"

? Offline

@kopper Narrator: "This package was, in fact, not safe"

? Offline

@kopper

This makes about as much sense as when they put a section "Alternatives: none" in a legislative bill.

NodeBB

thank you mr readme