Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. uncategorized
  3. ChangedDocker: Downgraded the Alpine base image in the Dockerfile to oldest supported version 3.19 for smaller images.

ChangedDocker: Downgraded the Alpine base image in the Dockerfile to oldest supported version 3.19 for smaller images.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved uncategorized
4 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • awoo@gts.apicrim.esA This user is from outside of this forum
    awoo@gts.apicrim.esA This user is from outside of this forum
    awoo@gts.apicrim.es
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Changed

    • Docker: Downgraded the Alpine base image in the Dockerfile to oldest supported version 3.19 for smaller images. (7928adb3d by [redacted])

    NOOOOO, THAT'S NOT SOMETHING YOU SHOULD DO

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • awoo@gts.apicrim.esA awoo@gts.apicrim.es

      Changed

      • Docker: Downgraded the Alpine base image in the Dockerfile to oldest supported version 3.19 for smaller images. (7928adb3d by [redacted])

      NOOOOO, THAT'S NOT SOMETHING YOU SHOULD DO

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @awoo

      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        @awoo

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @awoo What even is the point? I compared the images and it saves a measly 430kb !!

        All of which is negated by the fact that Docker is likely to keep the old image cached for a while after updating anyways

        awoo@gts.apicrim.esA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest

          @awoo What even is the point? I compared the images and it saves a measly 430kb !!

          All of which is negated by the fact that Docker is likely to keep the old image cached for a while after updating anyways

          awoo@gts.apicrim.esA This user is from outside of this forum
          awoo@gts.apicrim.esA This user is from outside of this forum
          awoo@gts.apicrim.es
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @freya yeah exactly! though in my experience Docker keeps it cached until you tell it to prune old, dangling images 😜

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups