Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. uncategorized
  3. www.androidauthority.com/android-developer-verification-requirements-3590911/

www.androidauthority.com/android-developer-verification-requirements-3590911/

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved uncategorized
53 Posts 24 Posters 348 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Guest

    @alexia @bigzaphod What’s cool about anarchy is that it always works because everyone is altruistic. See also libertarianism.

    li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
    li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
    li@tech.lgbt
    wrote last edited by
    #31

    @RyanHyde @alexia @bigzaphod

    whats cool about centralized authority figures is that they are universally serve the express purpose of causing harm, and being oppressive; and violating human rights.

    *gestures the everything*

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ? Guest

      @alexia I guess I've bought my last smartphone then. Can't deal w/ Apple's walled garden. If Android goes there too, I'm out. Fuck this shit.

      alexia@starlightnet.workA This user is from outside of this forum
      alexia@starlightnet.workA This user is from outside of this forum
      alexia@starlightnet.work
      wrote last edited by
      #32
      @48kRAM oh dont worry if you're running any device that still has Google Play you will almost certainly be affected

      : )
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        @RyanHyde @alexia @bigzaphod and what's cool about relying on big centralised bureaucracies to make sure everyone plays nicely is that they're always benevolent, always hyper-efficient, never make mistakes, and never leak confidential information. see also the US government.

        (this *is* how we play this game, right?)

        li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
        li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
        li@tech.lgbt
        wrote last edited by
        #33

        @thamesynne @RyanHyde @alexia @bigzaphod

        can't forget- they also rely on deliberately and guaranteeing to 'not playing nice' (i.e *violence, abuse, and mistreatment, and human rights violations*) when people don't follow their idea on what 'playing nicely' is, and at the same time perpertrate a soceity where that is seen is completely fine and acceptable as long as their the ones doing it, and that fosters dehumanization towards its victims; and promotes a system that actively incentivizes not being altruistic;

        see libertarianism: ok lets look at it, so basically they say that all that is bad if the one doing it is called the state, but if its called a corperation then it's magically fine, (and some variants of it say the state should ONLY cause harm; and not things like healthcare or running libraries)

        yeah so the issue is that your saying its magically fine to do that,

        but of course; this logic only applies if your supporting the status quo.

        (for OP: confidential information being leaked is good.)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • alexia@starlightnet.workA alexia@starlightnet.work
          www.androidauthority.com/android-developer-verification-requirements-3590911/

          I must reiterate. I really like open systems.

          This is the opposite of that. It's yet more infrastructure for Google to force dependence on Google Play Services in the wider Android ecosystem.

          It's also a great way to kill off a bunch of independent developers that make zero money from their project from publishing software for your platform.

          This idea needs to be canned.
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #34

          @alexia As one of those independent developers that make zero money from my project... fucking hell.

          This doesn't really "affect /me/" directly (I (also) publish to Google Play, so I already had to go through this, and thankfully I'm in a place where I can afford to do so while staying relatively safe).

          But goddamn does this shit still make my blood boil. I care about what people *in general* can do, not just me. I care about people having the easy option to fork it, for that matter. I also happen to be in a place where a decent chunk of my contributors don't have a development background at all, let alone for Android specifically.

          And goddamn does it leave a bitter aftertaste, making me reluctant to give them more of my free labour.

          But I also have no realistic plan B, or any real idea what it would look like. iOS is just jumping out of the ashes and into the fire. Mainline phone Linux (Pine, Librem, etc) is just wildly impractical as a sole phone (I can't even file my taxes without BankID..). And what else is there?

          alexia@starlightnet.workA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ? Guest

            @RyanHyde @bigzaphod @alexia Yeah okay but that's exactly what this is doing? Google will have the choice to approve or not of a developer. That's absolute and they will abuse this, as companies always do.

            What even is the "free rein" for developers you are talking about? That they can make and publish stuff without being forced to go through 50 hoops including revealing their identity to get the approval of your favorite megacorp? Maybe I, a user, don't want a corporation to have more power over my own hardware than me?

            We're not even talking about an "industry", or a "market"? This is nonsensical

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #35

            @zoee @RyanHyde @bigzaphod @alexia this is the free reign in question, and probably why these stories are breaking at the same time: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/malicious-android-apps-with-19m-installs-removed-from-google-play/

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest

              @thamesynne @alexia @bigzaphod Not really, to answer your last question. A repudiation of one dumb idea isn’t an endorsement of its inversion. What’s fun about middle ground is that it always exists, and there’s more of it than you’d think!

              li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
              li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
              li@tech.lgbt
              wrote last edited by
              #36

              @RyanHyde @thamesynne @alexia @bigzaphod

              not endorsing the first idea-- is endorsing anarchy, otherwise your just endorsing the first one again;

              there is no 'middle ground' on this -- that's just unironically doing the centrist meme where its like "what if we murder half the jews"

              .. either you support actual human rights (i.e where they arent violated just because an authority figure said so) .. or you don't ...

              it sounds like you don't.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest

                @thamesynne @alexia @bigzaphod Not really, to answer your last question. A repudiation of one dumb idea isn’t an endorsement of its inversion. What’s fun about middle ground is that it always exists, and there’s more of it than you’d think!

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Guest
                wrote last edited by
                #37

                @RyanHyde the middle ground already exists, and it's the current side-loading process, which requires you to *explicitly* choose a somewhat obscure setting, to allow installation of apps of "unknown sources"

                someone who is sideloading will generally already know what they're doing, since they have to flip this permission on. even if done permanently, it's not a global option but a per-app option to allow such installs from, say, the file manager. malware detection via Google Play Protect is *also* already a thing, mentioned in the linked article

                you appear to have assumed that arguing against centralized signature verifiers to be *allowed to develop for Android,* means arguing against *any* attempt at verification. instead, it's really just: "Android, let's not do exactly what Apple is doing to wall in the garden, thanks"

                seems like the best middle ground would be for Google to simply, not do this thing

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • alexia@starlightnet.workA alexia@starlightnet.work
                  www.androidauthority.com/android-developer-verification-requirements-3590911/

                  I must reiterate. I really like open systems.

                  This is the opposite of that. It's yet more infrastructure for Google to force dependence on Google Play Services in the wider Android ecosystem.

                  It's also a great way to kill off a bunch of independent developers that make zero money from their project from publishing software for your platform.

                  This idea needs to be canned.
                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #38

                  @alexia I can't wait until there's a ready for prime time mobile Linux distro. Maybe it's time to try some of the alpha alternatives to Android that I understand are out there?

                  alexia@starlightnet.workA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Guest

                    @alexia As one of those independent developers that make zero money from my project... fucking hell.

                    This doesn't really "affect /me/" directly (I (also) publish to Google Play, so I already had to go through this, and thankfully I'm in a place where I can afford to do so while staying relatively safe).

                    But goddamn does this shit still make my blood boil. I care about what people *in general* can do, not just me. I care about people having the easy option to fork it, for that matter. I also happen to be in a place where a decent chunk of my contributors don't have a development background at all, let alone for Android specifically.

                    And goddamn does it leave a bitter aftertaste, making me reluctant to give them more of my free labour.

                    But I also have no realistic plan B, or any real idea what it would look like. iOS is just jumping out of the ashes and into the fire. Mainline phone Linux (Pine, Librem, etc) is just wildly impractical as a sole phone (I can't even file my taxes without BankID..). And what else is there?

                    alexia@starlightnet.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                    alexia@starlightnet.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                    alexia@starlightnet.work
                    wrote last edited by
                    #39
                    @natkr

                    Well, I'm sure I dont have to explain to you how BankID and a phone in general being required is another vector through which Google ensures vendor lock-in 🙃

                    We really need regulation for these things.
                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? Guest

                      @alexia I can't wait until there's a ready for prime time mobile Linux distro. Maybe it's time to try some of the alpha alternatives to Android that I understand are out there?

                      alexia@starlightnet.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                      alexia@starlightnet.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                      alexia@starlightnet.work
                      wrote last edited by
                      #40
                      @elaterite If you're looking for something with a more pragmatic "make it work first" approach youre probably interested in the UBPorts project, which maintain Ubuntu Touch nowadays, but they use a lot of the original vendor stuff from Android.

                      If you're looking for something more idealistic, working towards a future where our devices run mainline Linux, look to
                      postmarketos.org
                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • alexia@starlightnet.workA alexia@starlightnet.work
                        @elaterite If you're looking for something with a more pragmatic "make it work first" approach youre probably interested in the UBPorts project, which maintain Ubuntu Touch nowadays, but they use a lot of the original vendor stuff from Android.

                        If you're looking for something more idealistic, working towards a future where our devices run mainline Linux, look to
                        postmarketos.org
                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote last edited by
                        #41

                        @alexia Thanks for the tips, Alexia! I looked at postmarketos but my old devices have not been tested with it. I can hack a bit, but I'm not up to doing it from scratch. I'll checkout UBPorts when I get time. Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? Guest

                          @bigzaphod @alexia False equivalency. Your garage contraption doesn’t have the same potential for harm as software. Your novel can never log my keystrokes.

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote last edited by
                          #42

                          @RyanHyde @bigzaphod @alexia and all the software by vendors who have been approved would never ever track me around the internet and essentially act like spyware right? RIGHT?!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Guest

                            @alexia could also be misunderstanding what they mean by that so...

                            alexia@starlightnet.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alexia@starlightnet.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alexia@starlightnet.work
                            wrote last edited by
                            #43
                            @alex02
                            Well, no, not a misunderstanding at all. That is exactly what they mean.

                            Check the primary source:
                            developer.android.com/developer-verification
                            ? 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • alexia@starlightnet.workA alexia@starlightnet.work
                              @alex02
                              Well, no, not a misunderstanding at all. That is exactly what they mean.

                              Check the primary source:
                              developer.android.com/developer-verification
                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #44

                              @alexia figured. Pos really keep speed running getting sued.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • alexia@starlightnet.workA alexia@starlightnet.work
                                @natkr

                                Well, I'm sure I dont have to explain to you how BankID and a phone in general being required is another vector through which Google ensures vendor lock-in 🙃

                                We really need regulation for these things.
                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Guest
                                wrote last edited by
                                #45

                                @alexia Yeah, absolutely.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ? Guest

                                  @bigzaphod @alexia False equivalency. Your garage contraption doesn’t have the same potential for harm as software. Your novel can never log my keystrokes.

                                  lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #46

                                  @RyanHyde @bigzaphod @alexia fun fact: lots of trojan horses on google play with verified status. grammarly is one example. does "ai-powered text correction", and sends all text you enter into any form to its servers to achieve that.

                                  the fallacy here is seeing google as a trustable arbiter.

                                  li@tech.lgbtL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • alexia@starlightnet.workA alexia@starlightnet.work
                                    www.androidauthority.com/android-developer-verification-requirements-3590911/

                                    I must reiterate. I really like open systems.

                                    This is the opposite of that. It's yet more infrastructure for Google to force dependence on Google Play Services in the wider Android ecosystem.

                                    It's also a great way to kill off a bunch of independent developers that make zero money from their project from publishing software for your platform.

                                    This idea needs to be canned.
                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Guest
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #47

                                    @alexia Yes, Android is getting more and more broken...

                                    Just support #PostmarketOS or something, which is (except audio xD) really well usable

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ? Guest

                                      @beeoproblem @bigzaphod @alexia Buying tools is not distributing weapons. Building code is not publishing malware. You’re free to the former in both scenarios. You’re not allowed to do the latter, and someone has to be sure that’s not your aim.

                                      There are reasons regulation exists, and while many regulations go too far, eliminating them would be worse than having them.

                                      I encourage you to read my other responses elsewhere here. I’m not advocating for corporations to wield all the power. But I also don’t trust every random developer in the world.

                                      li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      li@tech.lgbt
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #48

                                      @RyanHyde @beeoproblem @bigzaphod @alexia

                                      > There are reasons regulation exists, and while many regulations go too far, eliminating them would be worse than having them.

                                      "regulations" are enforced through systemic violence and harm from the state & the entire purpose of ' verifying identity ' of developers is so you can inflict said violence and harm onto them, using said weapons given to those whom '"""have to"""" make sure thats not your aim;'

                                      the world is and always will be, better off without large power authority figures with the ability to cause harm to people and pretend its fine,

                                      eliminating regulations would be eliminating systemic violence and harm being done to people in the name of 'enforcing' said regulations, thus the world would be infinitely better off without them

                                      doing so is harm reduction which is good; - what we need is standardization

                                      you don't trust every random developer in the world? cool dont install their software then. don't demand they dox themselves to an authority figure

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                        @RyanHyde @bigzaphod @alexia fun fact: lots of trojan horses on google play with verified status. grammarly is one example. does "ai-powered text correction", and sends all text you enter into any form to its servers to achieve that.

                                        the fallacy here is seeing google as a trustable arbiter.

                                        li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        li@tech.lgbt
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #49

                                        @lritter @RyanHyde @bigzaphod @alexia

                                        no no you see its only malware if the one whos doing it is not a corperation or the state-

                                        such is the shitlib way ❤

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ? Guest

                                          @zoee @bigzaphod @alexia That’s fine for you to want that. I don’t want that. Both things can be true.

                                          Look, I’m not saying that <Big Tech Company> should have all the power in the world, or at they should be the sole arbiters. But I also don’t think <Whatever Developer> should have free rein. These forces need to be in proper tension for the industry and society to function well.

                                          If you want to make the argument that the system is not currently balanced, I’d agree with you. But I’ll never agree to arguments for an unregulated market.

                                          li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          li@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          li@tech.lgbt
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #50

                                          @RyanHyde @zoee @bigzaphod @alexia

                                          > Market

                                          this is people making software, its not corperate corperations publish shit in the play store, stop making everything capitalist

                                          > Unregulated

                                          aka: your rights arent violated by the state if you do osmething it doesnt approve of

                                          it is of course neither, this is not a market get that capitalist bullshit out of here, this is me making software and sharing it with everyone; not asking for money or anything the fuck off;

                                          and its not 'unregulated' your free to run av software on your thing, reverse engineer the program, and see that it does things you don't want, and then tell other people this file does things you don't want, this is self-regulated.

                                          unregulated software market is what Google Play is.

                                          you cannot demand i verify my identity, as if thats even a static or clear thing to begin with, for the express purpose of the state being able to hurt me easier if it turns out they deem it 'bad' .

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups