this one should not be considered to be "AI" because the last part is missing
-
this one should not be considered to be "AI" because the last part is missing
-
this one should not be considered to be "AI" because the last part is missing
@49016@mastodon.catgirl.cloud
<- Artificial Idiot
-
A awoo@gts.apicrim.es shared this topic
-
this one should not be considered to be "AI" because the last part is missing
@49016 how about this one then?
-
@49016 how about this one then?
@49016 it's severely lacking the I part in AI so yeah lol
-
@49016 it's severely lacking the I part in AI so yeah lol
@49016 no but seriously, it is so dumb in comparison