I added a FAQ to my website!
-
@volpeon no answer to the goat allegations??
@arch
Q: Are you a goat?
A:
-
I added a FAQ to my website! It's pretty handy to have something to point at when people have a question I was asked several times before. :wvrnMlem:
volpeon.ink/faq/@volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip oh i love the parallax on the footer. Only just noticed it!
-
@arch
Q: Are you a goat?
A: -
I added a FAQ to my website! It's pretty handy to have something to point at when people have a question I was asked several times before. :wvrnMlem:
volpeon.ink/faq/@volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip "What is a woozy and how woozy are you?"
-
I added a FAQ to my website! It's pretty handy to have something to point at when people have a question I was asked several times before. :wvrnMlem:
volpeon.ink/faq/ -
@volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip "What is a woozy and how woozy are you?"
@garfieldairlines
Q:
A:
-
-
I added a FAQ to my website! It's pretty handy to have something to point at when people have a question I was asked several times before. :wvrnMlem:
volpeon.ink/faq/@volpeon Volpi, pointing dragon.
Any particular reason why you chose to leave the faq items open when clicked vs closing all when another item is clocked? I feel this is often a debate.
-
I added a FAQ to my website! It's pretty handy to have something to point at when people have a question I was asked several times before. :wvrnMlem:
volpeon.ink/faq/@volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip Are you still the fox (with or without programming socks) from the past ?
-
@volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip Are you still the fox (with or without programming socks) from the past ?
@crw I don't really see myself as a foxxo anymore, but I still love them
-
@volpeon Volpi, pointing dragon.
Any particular reason why you chose to leave the faq items open when clicked vs closing all when another item is clocked? I feel this is often a debate.
@catraxx :drgn_fingergun:
Not really, I just chose the most simple implementation which is only a bunch of <details><summary>...</summary>...</details> tags. The behavior you describe would require some JavaScript on top. I'm not against that, I just didn't get to it yet. :neofox_laugh:
edit: I just learned you actually don't need JS, just a "name" attribute. That's super nice :brdHyper: -
@catraxx :drgn_fingergun:
Not really, I just chose the most simple implementation which is only a bunch of <details><summary>...</summary>...</details> tags. The behavior you describe would require some JavaScript on top. I'm not against that, I just didn't get to it yet. :neofox_laugh:
edit: I just learned you actually don't need JS, just a "name" attribute. That's super nice :brdHyper:@volpeon Also ye, they fixed that, it's quite comf now, but if i remember correctly it can not be animated? I might be wrong.
