@Erpel I think your idea is interesting, buuuut I'd recommend shorter generation. the best schappibot posts are the shortest, when the sentence is coherent but somehow funny. I don't think several paragraphs of gibberish work well. nobody will read. I recommend focusing on the title of the particular law and generating that.... e.g. Gesetz zur Verhinderung der Feinstaubbelastung bei Einsatz von minimalreduzierter Kleinstsäugetiere.

just my opinion though

@kaia@brotka.st yeah... I am fine tuning it at the moment. I am not really happy wiht how the texts come out either.
The idea was that the law title and the paragraph title is short so easy to find funny by everyone and the big text corpus more for people who are more interested in it...

Still trying to find the perfect mix. The Allow and Black list for words in law titles are a step forward

@kaia@brotka.st And btw: That Schappi bot and co are this "good" in its generation was also aprocess of finetuning.

BVerwG just has way more parameters to check and try out. Especially which text to read into the markov chains. I am fine tuning that, but I also need to alter the numbers on the text corpus generation. had the wrong goal there

@Erpel @kaiaThat Schappi bot and co are this “good” in its generation was also due to being Ente's bots

@schappi@brotka.st @kaia@brotka.st I spent 1uite some time trying out different parameters.
@cheri@snug.moe (who runs @cheri_yapper@snug.moe on her own hardware) gave me a tip because she runs it with even less "word per sentence" Generation.

The rest was just a trial and error. Shibao e.g. still runs the "old parameters" and she is fine with that.

My point is: Just because it is unfunny now doesn't mean you can alter it to make it into something more funny later. You just have to find out what and how to alter (Just going through all law texts doesn't cut it so I have to filter out)