This post did not contain any content.
a1ba@suya.place
@a1ba@suya.place
Posts
-
This post did not contain any content. -
This post did not contain any content.This post did not contain any content. -
This post did not contain any content.@waifu are you a mathematical genius though? -
This post did not contain any content.This post did not contain any content. -
us-east or us-westus-east or us-west
self-hosting is best -
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki @RedTechEngineer @mia like with the whole computer industry, they are not really special in that regard. -
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki @RedTechEngineer @mia it doesn't change the fact about vendor being unable to write drivers for what they literally made -
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki @RedTechEngineer @mia does vendor's u-boot and atf forks can be considered proprietary software?
They published the source code. And there is nothing in between except what's in maskrom -
This post did not contain any content.@mia @Suiseiseki @RedTechEngineer I love installing vendor fork of linux 4.19 with broken drivers for all IP blocks made by them in house in 2025 -
On Linux, if I want a library that can produce a nice stack trace on demand with function name + line number in my C code, which is your recommended choice?@bagder ok then, good
-
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki installing coreboot fork that somebody else made for you isn't programming.
I mean, you're right about booting on average ARM SoC being bad, but not for the reasons you think it is and especially solutions don't make any sense. -
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki many don't have but also many do have and it's used.
What to do with them?
Read some manuals and get real experience programming computers, dude. -
On Linux, if I want a library that can produce a nice stack trace on demand with function name + line number in my C code, which is your recommended choice?@bagder forgot to tell you, keep in mind it might not be built the way you want. Plus GCC includes the static build of it and it's possible to accidentally link with what it includes. -
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki but that's the thing with BIOS.
You need int 10h to interact with it, even set up the video mode. -
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki there is.
Not only you need io ports, though those usually are presented mmio on non-x86 architectures, you also need some interrupt vectors, to act like int 10h on x86.
But what's the point of simulating that if there is UEFI -
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki BIOS isn't properly standardized either. It's pretty much x86 specific -
This post did not contain any content.@Suiseiseki how about SBCs that have UEFI -
On Linux, if I want a library that can produce a nice stack trace on demand with function name + line number in my C code, which is your recommended choice?@bagder it directly parses DWARF and can (though, that relies on UB) work from the signal handler.
Plus it's not really that platform specifics as uses unwinder from C++ (that _Unwind_Backtrace call) -
On Linux, if I want a library that can produce a nice stack trace on demand with function name + line number in my C code, which is your recommended choice?@bagder libbacktrace by Ian Lance Taylor -
who let the cats out