NodeBB

Good morning, creatures. Today's forecast is: EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

Being a bat or wyvern is a good way to keep your wallet safe - you will almost never be tempted by YCH-s

@volpeon I think there is a difference, because code submitted by an outside contributor is generally understood to be potentially risky.
But being willing to use an AI coding tool *at all* implies a level of trust in the technology. And one of the big issue with this tech is a tendency to be "magical" in the mind of its advocates, which increases risk.
Whether this concern is valid or not is debatable, but these are definitely not the same situation

@nytpu Give yourself/us some credit, there is also

I lost the toot I got this article from, but its a fascinating read about how the supposed "intelligence" of LLMs is basically a psychic scam. To which humans have always been susceptible

https://softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llmentalist/

"In trying to make the LLM sound more human, more confident, and more engaging, but without being able to edit specific details in its output, AI researchers seem to have created a mechanical mentalist.

Instead of pretending to read minds through statistically plausible validation statements, it pretends to read and understand your text through statistically plausible validation statements.

The validation loop can continue for a while, with the mark constantly doing the work of convincing themselves of the language model’s intelligence. Done long enough, it becomes a form of reinforcement learning *for the mark*."

@Decimal @FrazzledWings EEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeee